> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://help.iteam.works/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Discovery — investigation in a loop

> In Discovery mode you give a goal instead of a question, and the agent investigates in rounds: it raises hypotheses, queries the data, supports or discards each one, and compiles everything into a report with charts.

In a normal chat you ask a **question** and get an answer. In **Discovery mode** you give a **goal** — and the agent investigates in rounds until it closes, on its own.

<Frame caption="📸 Screenshot to insert [/en/intelligence/discovery]: a discovery in progress, showing the analysis counter, the progress bar, and the Next fronts panel.">
  <img src="https://mintcdn.com/iteam/E1mg8rFlXblsaNT0/images/placeholder.svg?fit=max&auto=format&n=E1mg8rFlXblsaNT0&q=85&s=36c435f4df28c31a7e114586a931bbd2" alt="A discovery in progress" width="800" height="420" data-path="images/placeholder.svg" />
</Frame>

## Turning it on

<Steps>
  <Step title="Open the agent's chat">
    Pick an agent that has access to the data you want to investigate.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Click the Discovery mode icon">
    It sits in the message bar. A notice confirms it: *your next message becomes the goal*.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Write a goal, not a question">
    "Find where the accounts payable cycle loses money" works better than "how much did we spend last month".
  </Step>
</Steps>

<Tip>
  Ask explicitly for what you want back: **tested hypotheses**, **gaps and opportunities**, **impact in currency**, and a **chart**. The agent delivers what you ask for — what you don't ask for tends to come back as prose.
</Tip>

## What happens during the investigation

The agent builds a plan and opens several analysis **fronts**. Each round it queries the data, concludes, and uses what it found to decide the next round.

<AccordionGroup>
  <Accordion title="Analysis counter" icon="loader">
    Shows where it stands — for example, *3 of 12 analyses*. You can leave the screen and come back: the investigation keeps going.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Next fronts" icon="list-checks">
    The queue of questions it still plans to investigate. This is where the iterative nature becomes visible — it's not a single answer.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Hypothesis supported or discarded" icon="scale">
    Every hypothesis is checked against real data. When one doesn't hold, it **says so** instead of forcing a conclusion.
  </Accordion>
</AccordionGroup>

## What comes out

<CardGroup cols={2}>
  <Card title="Verdict tables" icon="table-2">
    Hypothesis, cases, value, and verdict — side by side.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Charts" icon="chart-column">
    Built on the spot from what was found.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Gaps and opportunities" icon="lightbulb">
    Sized in currency, so you can prioritize by what actually weighs.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Compiled canvas" icon="file-text">
    A structured document with overview, data, metrics, and risks.
  </Card>
</CardGroup>

When it finishes, the agent also offers **strategic angles** — new questions raised by the investigation itself — and the option to **turn it into an action plan**.

<Info>
  A discovery can take from a few minutes to several dozen, depending on depth. It runs on the server: you can close the screen and come back later.
</Info>
